Anker SOLIX C300 vs Anker SOLIX C200 DC
Anker SOLIX C300
Anker SOLIX C200 DCThe C200 DC is 117% lighter, and that is the gap worth deciding on: it is the one you will actually carry. They are level on rated cycle life and maximum solar input. Scored across this catalogue they land at 4.7 and 5.3 out of 10.
PowerStationFacts takes part in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. When you buy through a link on this page we may earn a commission, and the price you pay does not change.
It leads by 117% on weight. That is the combination most people are actually choosing between.
Check price on AmazonIt leads by 50% on capacity. Those are the axes to buy it for, and the only ones.
Check price on AmazonThe specifications side by side
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Score | 4.7/10 | 5.3/10 |
| Capacity | 288 Wh | 192 Wh |
| AC output | 300 W | Not published |
| Surge | 600 W | Not published |
| Cell chemistry | LiFePO4 | LiFePO4 |
| Cycle life | 3,000 cycles to 80% | 3,000 cycles to 80% |
| Wall recharge | Not published | Not published |
| Max solar input | 100 W | 100 W |
| UPS switchover | 10 ms | No UPS function |
| Weight | 9.1 lb (4.1 kg) | 4.2 lb (1.9 kg) |
| Extra batteries | Not expandable | Not expandable |
The rows worth your attention are the ones where the gap is large enough to change a decision. On this pair that means weight and capacity. Everything else is close enough to ignore.
Where they really separate: weight
This is the one gap large enough to decide the question. The C200 DC comes out 117% ahead on weight, and the reason that matters is practical rather than arithmetic.
There is a threshold between a unit one adult carries upstairs without planning it and one that becomes a two-person job. Cross it and the unit stops moving, which changes what you bought it for.
The other differences, in order of size
- Capacity. The C300 leads by 50%.
None of these is decisive on its own. Taken together they describe two units built to slightly different briefs, which is worth knowing before you choose on the headline figure alone.
What each one will run
Same arithmetic for both: usable watt hours after an assumed 85% inverter efficiency, divided by average draw rather than peak.
Anker SOLIX C300
| Appliance | Typical draw | Estimated run time |
|---|---|---|
| Fridge | 120 W | 5 h 50 min |
| CPAP machine | 45 W | 5 h 26 min |
| Router and modem | 15 W | 16 h 19 min |
| Television | 90 W | 2 h 43 min |
| Microwave | 1200 W | 0 h 12 min |
Anker SOLIX C200 DC
| Appliance | Typical draw | Estimated run time |
|---|---|---|
| Fridge | 120 W | 3 h 53 min |
| CPAP machine | 45 W | 3 h 38 min |
| Router and modem | 15 W | 10 h 53 min |
| Television | 90 W | 1 h 49 min |
| Microwave | 1200 W | 0 h 8 min |
For your own appliance and its real wattage, the run time calculator shows the assumptions on screen and lets you move them.
Common questions
Is the C300 or the C200 DC better value?
This site does not print prices, because a stale price is worse than none. Check both on Amazon, then weigh the gap against the differences above. A 117% lead on weight is worth paying for only if that axis matters to your use.
Can I compare their surge ratings directly?
Not always. BLUETTI's Lifting Power and EcoFlow's X-Boost run appliances above rated output by lowering voltage, which suits a kettle or a heater but not a motor or a computer. A conventional surge rating means something else: a brief tolerance for start-up current. The table keeps each maker's own label attached.
Is the newer one simply a better version?
Not automatically. Makers revise units to hit a different price or size, and a newer model sometimes drops something the older one had. Read the table rather than the generation number.